Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- linux_config_iscsi [2019/11/06 16:04] – [Linux] andonovj
+++ linux_config_iscsi [2019/11/07 00:25] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 ====Windows====
-In Windows server, you can create it via the wizzard:
+In Windows server, you can create it via the wizzard in the Server Manager and it should be something like this at the end:
+{{ :iscsitargerwindows.jpg?400 |}}
@@ Line 289: / Line 291: @@
 <sxh bash>
-grep " Attached scsi disk" messages
 [root@oraback log]# grep " Attached scsi disk" /var/log/messages
 Nov  6 16:49:22 oraback kernel: sd 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdf
@@ Line 348: / Line 349: @@
 </sxh>
+=====Performance=====
+I've found that iSCSI isn't particulary fast. I've found that my environment isn't so much loaded. That can be because the clients aren't using Jumbo frames so that might be the reson.
+<sxh bash>
+[root@server Logs]# ip link show | grep mtu
+: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT
+: eno16780032: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP mode DEFAULT qlen 1000
+: virbr0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN mode DEFAULT
+: virbr0-nic: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master virbr0 state DOWN mode DEFAULT qlen 500
+[root@server Logs]# ls -lart
+</sxh>
+Here is a good article of how to speed up the performance of the iSCSI:
+https://www.monperrus.net/martin/performance+of+read-write+throughput+with+iscsi